14th June 2010 Coles Bay
That is an outrageous falsehood
Poor Federal Hotels, I should be ashamed of myself. They are legally going about their business of creating poverty and a greater burden on society in general.
If Pinochet were still alive I’m sure he would stay there, as a prominent share holder.
Both Pinochet and the Saffire Resort owe their success to the misery of the poor masses for the benefit of the wealthy few.
Pinochet and the Saffire resort would surely and appropriately complement each other.
It is a despicable and sad thing that the Labor government negotiated the creation of this resort as part of a deal that gives federal hotels a 20 year monopoly on poker machines in Tasmania. There is already a lot of poverty in Tasmania, and apparently in the first six months of this year (2010) Tasmanians have lost over 100 million dollars to the Federal Hotels group. That means around 200 million dollars a year from Tasmania alone. This will put a huge cost on social services; in effect, we’re all footing the bill, we’re contributing to the wealth of Federal Hotels and their share holders.
I don’t think much of the share holders either.
The biggest difference between business associated with illegal drugs and business associated with poker machines is one is legal the other isn’t.
The photo is of Nathan doing a handstand on the beach at Coles Bay. You can see the Saffire Resort in the background.
Popularity: 3% [?]



August 8th, 2010 at 17:05
Here here!