
17th June 2009, Wiebke’s place.
This is a shot of Dufus, Wiebke’s cat who recently passed away. In the background is an aloe vera plant sitting on the window sill.
I finally thought I found the closest thing to an ideal camera for me. It is the Panasonic Lumix G1. It is a tiny camera with a 4/3rds sensor and interchangeable lenses like an slr.
But, there’s a catch. In the last few firmware updates for this and some other Panasonic cameras, there is code that prevents the camera working with generic (and much cheaper) batteries. Any of these cameras manufactured after June 2009 will come with this updated firmware already installed.
You may wonder why would anyone update their camera with this new firmware? It’s because there are some genuine improvements in it as well. For example, one improvement is better focus in low light situations - this is something of great importance to most photographers.
Of course there are a lot of people out there who have had these cameras for quite a while, and using them with generic batteries. Now they will have to decide, or already have done, whether to install the update and lose the use of their batteries or forgo the improvements. If they choose the update they will then have to pay big bucks for replacement batteries.
Panasonic is trying to suggest that this is for safety reasons. Although, as pointed out on many online photography forums, the only high profile battery disasters to date have been with OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) batteries in laptops, phones and mp3 players. In my research I haven’t come across any stories of Panasonic cameras being destroyed, or any camera being destroyed, by using a generic battery. I’ve been using generic batteries for over ten years.
Scepticism is rife. The main reason is the cost of Panasonic batteries. The store I was going to get my camera from sells the Panasonic batteries for $189.00 au; the generic batteries at the same store are $59.00. You can buy generic batteries for much cheaper.
There is absolutely no reason for a camera battery to be this expensive, except for profit. There is a huge choice of new cameras for under $200.00 that come with lithium ion battery packs - the same technology as the Panasonic batteries being discussed. Panasonic simply wouldn’t sell many batteries at this price for their cameras if people were able to buy the much cheaper generic ones.
The average person who wants to buy one of these cameras would be unlikely to find out this information before, or during, their purchase. I have been researching these cameras for months, and only came across the information when searching for cheap generic batteries. You can still buy generic batteries for any of these cameras from reputable stores with no warning that they won’t work. I assume that many of the sellers aren’t aware of this; online stores like those on ebay rely on positive feedback, so I can’t imagine that they would want this trouble.
The G1 in particular is power hungry. I would have bought two extra batteries for a total of three to cover extended trips away from civilization (bushwalking trips etc).
Some people have reported that their generic batteries are working normally after the update. There is discussion as to whether this was/is Panasonic reversing their decision (with no public anouncement) due to outcry from the photographic community, or was it a short lived update no longer available that was released without the offending code. I have contacted Panasonic Australia to try and find what the truth is - I’ll post the answer if I get it.
Popularity: 24% [?]